The amount of access to information that people have these days is astounds g, and their consumption of it, even greater. He supports this by mentioning how hyperlinks don’t merely point to related works; they propel you toward them. ” Carr believes that we should be skeptical of the internet because of the adverse ways it may be shah ping the way we think. Thinking critically about his article, one can find some patterns i n his writing, such as fact and fiction, presenting evidence with an argument, and c cause and effect. Carr starts his article with a quote from a CIFS movie. Dave, stop, will you” (Carr 1). He starts off illustrating an eerie scene from the 001 movie Space Odyssey . This part of the article is obviously fictional, but does a good job of leading up to his next point. He discusses that he feels like his mi ND is being influenced by advancing technologies. He states that even as a writer hi s mind struggles to keep focused on a book, something that is new to him. He blame this on the internet, which he describes as “The perfect recall of silicone me He uses his friends as examples, stating that “.. Any are having similar expert encase” (2). While impossible to tell if this fiction or not, one can reason that he’s most likely dating fact. Carr does bring up facts from a London study where results jug est. that internet readers aren’t reading in traditional methods and that they do not ABA sorbs the text that they are reading. Following that though, he sneaks his opinion that ” We are what we read” (3). Carr then does bring up a conversation that he had, stating interesting fact of how reading is not part of our genes like how speech is.
That t is a very interesting fact and that suggests that the way we read can be influenced just like other habits. He brings in quotes from other professors he has talked to and mentis ins how the human brain can still be molded even at older ages. To help support his did concussion, he brings up a very interesting part of history. With the invention of the mesh inimical clock, people’s minds were changed into thinking in mathematical sections of time. That people “… Eat, work, sleep, rise, we stopped listening to our senses and starts d obeying the clock’ (4).
When identifying the argument in Car’s article, some interesting g ideas and evidence surface. The most apparent point of this essay is to stir discussion how the internet m ay have negative effects on the human mind. He States how his own memory is being affected by speeding on the internet jumping from one page to the next. He f rather supports that his reading habits that used to be natural for him have become struggles. He argues that the zip lining across the internet is changing how we read and how we interpret text.
He backs this up from evidence from studies performed in Loon don that suggests that people exhibit ‘”a form of skimming activity’ and “… Read no MO re than one or two pages Of an article or a book before they would bounce out to anon there site” (3). Another point he tries to argue is that technology is taking part of forming in his thoughts. He proposes that it has “changed from arguments to aphorisms, fro thoughts to puns, from rhetoric to telegram style” (4). The pattern of cause an d effect is also apparent in his writing, starting from the very beginning.
Early in the essay, Carr suggests that he is having trouble reading. He then rag uses that the way we use the internet has hindered his attention, and that he is not all nee with this problem. This claim becomes more valid after he references some of his Cole agues and enforces his argument and thesis. One of the most compelling examples of cause and effect is found later in the essay. Carr introduces the idea of the mechanical CLC sock, a piece of technology that arose in the 14th century. Carr states, ” … He clock disassociated time from human events and helped create the belief in an indeed pendent world of mathematically measurable sequences” (4). That is a startling concept tan definitely goes along the line of cause and effect, suggesting that the clock co multiple affected the way our minds operate. The last pattern of tone can be found thro ought the paper. Car’s tone seems to have a concerned feel to it, and rightfully should. This ca be found by analyzing some of the examples that he gives, and how he seems almost nervous about what the future holds.
A good example is when he begins to TA k about the internet again. Carr says, “The internet, an immeasurably powerful comps ting system, is submersing most of our other intellectual technologies” (5). He use s words such as “immeasurably’, “powerful”, and “submersing” that suggests that the internet is truly a threat to us. His purpose seems to get a message across, saying to be aware of how the internet is shaping us. Carr suggests that we should be skeptical of his skepticism, but he brings up some very interesting concepts.
Adverse effects Of the internet are undoubted idly out there, and Carr does a good job of getting that across. He uses patterns of face fiction, cause and effect, evidence and tone and leaves the reader with much t o think about. His paper works because it stirs up thoughts about the relationship between technology and us and backs it up correctly. Maybe we shouldn’t be concerned about Google making us stupid, but how as technology shapes and contorts t he way our minds work.