The conceptual definition is aperception that connects it to the abstract perceptive. It describes that adescription given to a set object or thought is a measurable feature which separatesit from other objects. According to Liebler, Porter, Fernandez, Noon, andEnnis, (2017) the conceptual definition is a comprehensive account ofunjustifiable phenomena with the actual utilization of the particular terms orideas. It also encompasses identifying what is meant when specific terms areused in the research findings.
It can be referred as the intellectual procedurethat points clear and unclear ideas as well as providing the definite meaning.This also includes a detailed description and explanation of the gauges to beused to quantify the idea of the scope. The definition of operational is thedepiction of an investigational process for the generation of the variable intoa measurement or the numerical value.
- Thesis Statement
- Structure and Outline
- Voice and Grammar
This concept involves the methods thatresearchers use to resolve and measure the specific factors. In one sense, theoperational definition in research is more categorical since it does not take intoaccount of the study but link itself with it (Macartney, Bishaw, &Fontenot, (2013). Typically, it points out the particulars of the proceduresused in quantifying the variables under the investigation. It then outlines allthe operations in the category of the manipulation essential in finding out theexistence of the object in a clear manner. ConceptualizesRaceThe conceptualization of thevariable race is the comprehending of the consideration that is important torealize before understanding the application of the variables.
In this view,the conceptualization of the race is assumed to be the rational process ofdriving at the meaning of the race. Therefore, the entirety of this concept isbased on the social construct as opposed to the biological perception (Ríos,Romero, & Ramírez. 2014). The implied definition of the race and it’snature mold the racial attitudes of people.
Whatever an individual thinks aboutnature and race tells us what the social concept is. The purpose is to identifydiverse scopes of which results in different categories.OperationalizesRace It involves pinpointing or more fixed,observable events in the way that other researchers can self-reliably test andrecord themselves. In this view, scientists use the race variable as anidentifier to illustrates and classify the populations (Ríos et al.,2014).Therefore, to operationalize race, it implies the process of categorizingindividuals in respect to social status notably working class or regarding thecolor of a person’s skin.
It can also be defined by grouping individuals bytheir languages for the racial address, such as Indians and Asians. Therefore,the operationalizing race is understood as the way of looking into the world atthe wider angle.CensusBureau Changes There are a lot of number change adjustmentsthat the Bureau made to operationalize and conceptualize the race in 2000census. First, it is evident that theoffice of Management and Budget revised its criteria for the cataloging of theethnicity and race in 1997 which permitted the minimum of five classes of thedata on race, which include: Asian, Africans, Americans, Alaska Native andAmerican. Also, the similar office also accepted the growth of the sixthgrouping commonly known as “Some Other Race”, to take care of the interests ofthe respondents who were not included in the original five classes.
There were also notable changes thatwere made in the wording of Hispanic origin question. It is understood that theinitial question was “is this an individual Latino/ Spanish /Hispanic?” Which was modified to “is this an individualof Spanish, Latino or Hispanic origin?” (Liebler, et al., 2007). It alsopointed out that the questions concerning non-Hispanics were later abandoned.Therefore, there was an inclusion of the Hispanic origin that was not formerlyincluded in the 2000 census. Also, the questionnaire that was used in 2010census, three areas were included in which the respondents provided detailedinformation regarding their race which later incorporated fifteen distinctresponse categories (Liebler et al., 2007).
Following these changes, several words phrases were also changed. Forexample, the popular notion “spot one or more boxes to find out what thisperson assumes him/herself to be” was changed into “spot one or two boxes.” Lastly, the change was made to theorigin and race of the Hispanic. According to Macartney et al.
(2013), thisincluded annexation of one area in which the participants were required tocover the particular Hispanic ancestry group apart from the five responsedistinct categories. It is noted that in the first class, the respondents whofailed to identify their race were demanded to fill their credentials there.However, the other responses which included Mexican, Puerto Rican, and Cubawere required to write down the answers that were combined to come up withcategory of Hispanic for the Office of Management and Budget.
Reasonsfor the Change Theamendment was meant to broaden the scope to create a distinct identity for theindividuals during 2000 census instead of remaining so broad. However, theagreement for the inclusion of the “Some Other Races” was carried out to takecare of the population that failed to identify the Official Five category forthe data and race (Macartney et al., 2013). Therefore, alterations were made tomake sure that the race of each person was counted correctly. Additionally, theamendment of the Hispanic question was meant to make sure the data collection wasmore accurate and inclusive. Lastly, the efforts to revise race and ancestry ofHispanics aimed to highlight more diverse communities.HowChanges in Variables Affects Conclusion The changing of the operationalization of the variable “race” is likelyto results into various summations regarding race depending on how the conceptis being stated. In essence, the variation in the assortment processes of theracial diversity would lead to the different conclusions.
Macartney et al.,2013). On the other hand, the variation in operationalizing race would lead todifferent perceptions about the race, depending on the individual know of it.
For example, if the office of the Management and Budget would not have includedmore categories, the findings of the race would have been off or inconclusivein their study. Therefore, including more groups allowed the census to be moreaccurate as opposed to the idea of having many races categorized as the singlegroup.Reflection From the issues stated in this discussion, itis apparent that Bureau’s operationalization conceptualization do no correspondwith mine. Viewing Bureau’s 2000 censusat a more critical angle, the amendments that we effected to operationalize andconceptualize the race, did not meet the threshold of the right context andmanner (Liebler et al.
, 2007). It did not meet the accuracy standards that isrequired because of the uncertainty in the category of “Some Other Races” whichwas added to the census. The Bureau made some remarkable changes during 2000census, given several changes that were implemented. They should not have endedat that, because there is a reason for expanding their scope of operationalizationand conceptualization; so that they can produce precise, reliable, accurate anduseful results in the next census.