In At that time, men, working outdoors, had

In "A Jury of Her Peers," Susan Glaspell illustrates many social standards women experienced at the turn of the century.She allows the reader to see how a woman's life was completely ruled by social laws, and thus by her husband.

Glaspell also reveals the ignorance of the men in the story, in particular the sheriff and the county attorney.I think some examples are rather extreme, but in Glaspell's day, they would have probably been common.Women did not have many rights at the turn of the century.

Sometimes it is hard to do all the work on your own
Let us help you get a good grade on your paper. Get expert help in mere 10 minutes with:
  • Thesis Statement
  • Structure and Outline
  • Voice and Grammar
  • Conclusion
Get essay help
No paying upfront

What few rights and freedoms they did have were dominated by social standards.They were expected to cater to their husbands' wishes and commands.I think their society oppressed them more often than their own husbands did.A good example of this in "A Jury of Her Peers" is Martha Hale.

Lewis Hale treats his wife as an equal privately, but does not treat her as an equal in public.When Mrs. Hale attempts to interrupt her husband as he tells the county attorney what he experienced in the Wright household she does not treat him as a master, but as an equal (Glaspell 260).Clearly she is not afraid of him.Many women at this time would have never even attempted to distract or interrupt their husband while they talked.

Clearly defined gender roles are prevalent throughout "A Jury of Her Peers."Men are supposed to work outside of the home, and women are supposed to work inside the home.Neither the men nor the women seem to appreciate the other's work.

The men do not realize the struggles women go through cooking, cleaning, and maintaining the house.The women seem to understand the hardships the men face, but feel that their own jobs are more difficult.At that time, men, working outdoors, had set hours, whereas the women worked almost all of the time they were awake. The sheriff is particularly critical of Mrs.

Wright.He does not consider her work to be of any worth.He dismisses her concerns about her preserves as pointless, not taking into consideration her time and effort put into them (Glaspell 264).He laughs about her wanting an apron while in jail when she most likely wore an apron daily at home.The county attorney creates a mess of pans under the sink by kicking them without any regard (Glaspell 264).

I wonder if he would appreciate someone entering his office with such little respect for his things?The deputy dirties the hand towel, which leads to the county attorney complaining about Mrs. Wright's house keeping (Glaspell 264).None of the men appreciate Mrs.

Wright's efforts.They are oblivious to her daily life whereas Mrs. Hale and Mrs.

Peters realize what she had been put through.Only when I realized this did I fully understand the title, "A Jury of Her Peers."By protecting Mrs. Wright, Mrs. Hale and Mrs.

Peters are truly a jury of her peers.The county attorney, the sheriff, and his deputies in "A Jury of Her Peers" all convey a n impression of ignorance and poor investigation to the reader.Sheriff Peters seems to be in complete control over the investigation.He refuses to take any blame for any of the mistakes, or admit that his deputy is not a perfect detective either.Mrs. Hale notices on the trip to the Wright's house how "pleasant and lively".

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


I'm Gerard!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out