Lately, there have been various discussions about the

Lately, there have been variousdiscussions about the values of the African philosophy in many aspects as itrelates to issues of human relationships, business ethics and corporategovernance. As a governing philosophy, the African is inclusive in nature as itconsiders all members of the community (organisation) as one entity aiming atachieving one purpose. There have been assertions that the ultimate success ofany organisation operating in an African environment is premised on this  African framework. This study aimed atestablishing corporate governance approach as practiced by organisations withinan African context.

When governments are  not democracies and are  not accountable   to    their   citizens,   nongovernmental  organizations (NGOs), and international,  multilateral  organizations and institutions represent possiblesources of change because they function outside of the  recipient state’s  bureaucracy. To  the  extentthat corruption exists in these countries, both  the  governmentand the private sector contribute to it.  Thus, although states may  be un- able,  or unwilling, to  force  corporations to  change, NGOs  have been  successful in  pressuring corporations to adopt codes  of con- duct  and various other standards of responsibility.Corporate governance in SouthAfrica was not stimulated by any significant crisis in the corporate sector asin the case of a few other countries, but by concerns of competitivenessfollowing the re-admission of South Africa to the global economy following itstransition to a fully-fledged democracy with the collapse of apartheid.Corporate governance has been well developed since the establishment of theKing Committee on Corporate Governance (“King Committee”) in 1992, at theinstigation of the Institute of Directors of Southern Africa (“IoD”) and therelease of the first King Report in November 1994. Apart from the requirementthat organisations should run their operations in the most economical,efficient and effective manner possible to increase performance, today, thereis an increasing insistence on the need for organisations to be ethical aswell.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Within the business framework, there is a clear relationship betweencorporate activities and other stakeholders within and outside the organisation(Khomba, 2011).In general, much of the  scholarly commentary on comparative corporate governancehas   focused  on  issuesof  convergence,  on whether corporate governance systems in  different countries are becoming more  similar to  one  another.The basic  point of comparison is the Anglo-American system,and the basic  thesis is often  that this system provides a model  to which other countries are slowly  assimilating. Because this  scholarship focuses primarily on Europe and Asia,9it does not adequately capture the  dilemmasof developing countries in  sub-Saharan Africa and other parts of the  world.The first King Report drewattention to the importance of a properly functioning board of directors as akey ingredient of good corporate governance.

While it advocated many of thestandards and principles common to several Commonwealth countries, followingthe release of the Cadbury Report in the United Kingdom in 1992, it was perhapsdistinguished by its integrated approach to good governance in the interests ofa wide range of stakeholders with regard to good financial, social, ethical andenvironmental practice. The word  Africanis derived from a Nguni (isiZulu) aphorism: Umuntu Ngumuntu Ngabantu, which canbe translated as “a person is a person because of or through others” (Moloketi,2009; Tutu, 2004).  African can bedescribed as the capacity in an African culture to express compassion,reciprocity, dignity, humanity and mutuality in the interests of building andmaintaining communities with justice and mutual caring (Khoza, 2006; Luhabe,2002; Mandela, 2006; Tutu, 1999).The  World Bank provides two  different kinds of support concerning  the   commercial  environments  in   member  countries.First,it exerts pressure on  governments to  promote an  environment conducive to business.Second, it providesdirect support to companies seeking to do business in developing countries.

SouthAfrica’s GDP is by far the largest on the African continent, at US$160 billion,but is a fraction of the global GDP of approximately US$36 000 billion – makingSouth Africa the 29th largest global economy in GDP terms.Subsequent to 1994, SouthAfrica’s financial system has emerged as a sophisticated and well developedsector of the economy, with similarities to major financial centres of thedeveloped world. In terms of size to GDP, private sector lending and the equitymarket ranks as one of the deepest in the world.

The increasing importance offinancial services to the economy and the role it plays in the asset allocationprocess, has increased pressures for market reforms to improve transparency andefficiency.An inclusive corporate governanceregime under the African African philosophy signifies that an organisation hasan explicit commitment to serve the interests of both shareholders andnon-shareholding stakeholders. Such an organisational commitment to astakeholder-centred approach towards corporate governance is partly influencedby African socio-cultural values. The African  African philosophy emphasises the importanceof community, solidarity, coexistence, and the inclusion of community members(Broodryk, 2005; Mangaliso, 2001; Mbigi and Maree, 2005).The first King Report offered tocompanies, and State-owned enterprises, a coherent and disciplined governanceframework relevant to local circumstances and practical in its guidance.

TheKing Committee has no official mandate, unlike nearly all other similarinitiatives globally, and thus its recommendations are self-regulatory innature. It no doubt has made an important contribution to the significantprogress by South Africa in its corporate governance reform since the politicaltransition in the mid-1990’s. The breadth and sophistication of these reformmeasures must surely place South Africa in the top ranks of emerging marketeconomies, and in some cases even alongside some of the more developed markets.Although corruption  in  law-makingis  significant in  preventing change in  a  country’s governance structure  and in  maintainingthe  dominance of the  existing elite, bribing government officials toobtain precious government access is  the largest area of corruption  in  developingcountries.

Because businesses need access to obtain export permits or business licenses,they may  feel  coerced into  bribing the  appropriate  official.Additionally, in  many developing countries where civil  service positions are poorly  (if at all) compensated jobs, government employeesmay  feel justified in accepting bribes fortheir services. Furthermore, it has been observed that the African inclusivegovernance approach could also be a result of strong support of developmentalactivities on the African continent (West, 2009). Finally, such an inclusiveapproach in Africa is also partly influenced by the strong presence ofstate-owned enterprises that pursue both social and economic agendas. In theinclusive nature of the African society, the recent King III Report ongovernance for South Africa “seeks to emphasize the inclusive approach togovernance” (Institute of Directors in Southern Africa, 2009).

The second King Report came aboutfollowing an assessment of the developments that had taken place in the SouthAfrican economy and in the global markets since 1994. Again, it was not drivenby any major crisis in the corporate sector. However, as it so happened,coincident with this review a number of crises came to light, in both privateand public sector companies, that provided stimulus to this second review. Furthermore,studies reveal that in an Asian society, informal external corporate governancethrough societal norms, practices and values are often more influential thanthe formal external corporate governance mechanisms of laws and regulations(Rossouw, 2009).The preceding literature analysisof both the African and Asian ethics reveals that society and other externalstakeholders have more influence on the internal governance of corporationsthan statutes and regulations do. This picture differs from that in America andContinental Europe.

A leaning towards a stakeholder- centred approach isdiscernable in both the Asian and African perspectives. Therefore, employingthe American exclusive shareholder-centred approach to corporate governancewithin an African framework would be a total mismatch towards an inclusivenature of the African society.The  IMF  estimatedthat less  than two  percent of all  government spending in  the  Congo during the  year 2000  was  expendedthrough normal government budgetary procedures. Instead, the Central Bank spentmoney without the   Treasury Department’sknowledge  or  input.Thus, corporations operate  in  a  contextwhere there is  little public fiscal  accountability, and an  environ- ment that is  conducive to  corruption.

When paying the  government, either directly or in  the  form of bribes, companies may  believe  that they are  not  responsiblefor ensuring that government revenues are  fairly spent, or in  ending the  abuse of government power that results in bribes.The  Congo,  whichis about the  size of the  United States to the east of  the  MississippiRiver, is  a  country rich  in  natural  re- sources. It exports diamonds, cobalt, copper,coffee,  and oil and has  vast deposits of coltan, a critical component ofcell phones and other technological equipment.

But  the  countryhas  a  long  history of corruption.A particular emphasis in thesecond King Report was on the qualitative aspects of good corporate governance.In other words, the second King Report was not designed as a regulatoryinstrument but was really developed to identify core areas of good practice forboards, directors and companies, which extended beyond the existing legal andregulatory framework to embrace a number of aspirational issues. The reviewreinforced guidelines acknowledging the societal obligations of companies, indirectlyemphasising the expectations of government and the wider community with respectto the contribution of the corporate sector to the country’s transition anddevelopment.

Given the difficulties of applying the guidelines across theentire South African economy, the guidelines contained in the second KingReport focus primarily on companies quoted on the Johannesburg securitiesexchange (“JSE”), banks and financial institutions, and public sectorenterprises and agencies at the national and provincial levels. These fallwithin a structured and more readily regulated environment, against which thestandards of corporate governance can be more easily identified and measured.It is also more likely that public interest issues and investor rights andinterests would be impacted by the behaviour of these particular categories oforganisations. The King II Report is notable for explicitly adopting aninclusive stakeholder-centred approach to corporate governance that has itsroots in the stakeholder theory, in opposition to the model of shareholderprimacy maintained in the UK and USA (West, 2009). The South Africanimperatives were reinforced in the passing of the Broad-based Black EconomicEmpowerment Act, No 53 of 2003 (South Africa, 2003), which established a formalstructure to reward companies meeting certain criteria, usually related to thelevel of black ownership, employment and procurement practices. Anotherdevelopment was the inclusion of the international financial reportingstandards (IFRS) into corporate reports.

The internationalfinancial reporting standardshave been officially adopted within the corporate governance reporting systemsin South Africa and most African countries.The King II Report was reviewedin response to the new company legislation, and this culminated in a newcorporate governance report, the King III Report. The key theme of the King IIIReport is an even greater focus on sustainability and ethical reporting systemsthat  should be adopted by corporations(Du Plessis and Prinsloo, 2010). In general, the King III Report adopts thesame overall stance as the King II Report, encouraging companies to take astakeholder approach while maintaining formal structures with a shareholder orientation.The board is identified as thefocal point of the corporate governance system and is ultimately accountableand responsible for the performance and affairs of the company. This calls fora unitary board structure, common to countries falling broadly-speaking underthe Commonwealth system of law, requiring a balance of executive andnon-executive directors on the board with a majority of the non-executivedirectors preferably independent of management.

Independence has been given awide definition, largely driven by the more rigorous tests used byinternational investors, and was directed at the tight-knit nature of the SouthAfrican business community historically and the need for boards to consider awider pool of candidates. This has given particular emphasis to issues ofdiversity, both in terms of gender and race, highlighted as a strategicimperative for companies wishing to remain relevant in the South Africanbusiness environment Today, the  Congo  may  be  emerging from a  long  civil war.The  death toll  is  over three million, including not  only  soldiers,but  also  civilians who died  from  starvationand disease.The  ille- gal exploitation ofthe Congo’s natural resources, particularly gold and diamonds,in  addition to coltan, cobalt, and timber, fundedthe  Civil  War.There were  virtually no barriers to money- laundering.

Indeed,the  abuses  of  natural resources were   so egregiousthat the United Nations issued a special report recommending that  twentynine companies be  subjected to  financial restrictions,  including a  freezing of assets and   a  suspensionof banking abilities.The  current Congolese president, Joseph Kabila, whotook  office in 2001  after his  father was  killed by a bodyguard, has agreed to  hold  electionswithin the  next several years.There are  four vice-presidents representing the  differing former combatant parties   as  well as  the   nascent political parties, and   thousandsof peace-keepers from the United Nations throughout the country.

The  European Union is  conducting an  evaluation of the entire judicial system to suggest reforms. In a survey conducted, Themajority of respondents report that their external corporate reporting systemstake into account the triple bottom line as recommended by the King III Report (Instituteof Directors in Southern Africa, 2009). A total of 63.

1% agreed (36.7% “agreeand 26.4% “strongly agree”), while 15.7% disagree and 21.2% “somehow agree”with the statement.The above analysis indicates thatwhilst many companies have embraced the triple bottom line reporting system,some are not fully adhering to the triple bottom line reporting requirements,signifying the transitional nature of triple bottom line reporting systemwithin corporate reporting and governance systems.

Open disclosure of wealthdistribution to stakeholders The study aimed at ascertainingwhether or not organisations are open in distributing their wealth to differentstakeholders through corporate reporting systems, as recommended by Szwajkowski(2000). A vast majority (80.9%) of respondents agree (46.

0% “Agree” and 34.9%”Strongly agree”) that they deploy open resource allocation disclosure. Only3.1% disagree, while 16.0% “somehow agree” with the preceding statement.

Thisanalysis demonstrates that most organisations prefer open disclosure ofresource allocations which is in line with good corporate governanceprinciples. Disclosure of wealth distribution would ultimately encourageparticipation by different stakeholders in the overall business activities andcorporate sustainability in the long term.The roles of chairman and chiefexecutive officer are required to be separate, which has since been reinforcedby the JSE, banking and financial markets regulators, and regulations governingpublic sector companies. Furthermore, the position of chairman should be heldby an independent non-executive director, and steps have been taken bycompanies across a wide spectrum to address this requirement.

The length of executive directorservice contracts is restricted to a maximum term of three years and should bethe subject of shareholder confirmation if longer, while extensive disclosureof individual director (executive and non-executive) remuneration and benefitsis now enforced by a number of the regulators. Detailed guidelines have beenprovided in relation to the requirements for audit, remuneration and nominationcommittees with a strong emphasis on the role of independent non-executivedirectors in this process. Board committees, too, are required to undergoregular independent evaluation.

Extensive disclosure is nowcalled for in terms of the requirements of the second King Report and it isclear that directors are much more concerned about their ability to fulfiltheir obligations and are more diligent towards the implications of accepting invitationsto serve as a director. The  current Congolese president, Joseph Kabila, whotook  office in 2001  after his  father was  killed by a bodyguard, has agreed to  hold  electionswithin the  next several years.There are  four vice-presidents representing the  differing former combatant parties   as  well as  the   nascent political parties,76   and   thousandsof peace-keepers from the United Nations throughout the country.Practically and on moral grounds,all stakeholders as part of the organisational community are supposed to beincluded in organisational settings and systems. Stakeholders should have ashare in terms of information disclosure and wealth distribution.

The inclusivestakeholder-centred approach towards governance would therefore ensure continuedinterdependence and coexistence of all stakeholders and hence the entirecorporate and eco-systems system. It is envisaged that the inclusivestakeholder-centred approach towards corporate governance guarantees corporatesustainability for future business operations and profits as well assustainability of future generations. Therefore, such an inclusive approachtowards corporate governance should be deployed by all organisations operatingwithin an African framework.Effective risk management andinternal control systems are essential in a successful corporate governancesystem.

On this score, clear-cut guidelines are provided and which emphasisesthe board’s responsibility for the total process of risk in the business. The guidelines provided by thesecond King Report further assigned to the board the requirements to developrisk strategy policies, set the company’s risk tolerance level, and assess thecompany’s risk profile on the basis of various risk categories including creditrisk, market risk, operational risk, human resources risk, regulatory and legalrisk, etc. Boards are also required to ensure an appropriate whistle blowingprocess in the company, supplementing legislation recently introduced in thisregard.

Companies quoted on the JSE arerequired to provide a comprehensive annual statement on risk and internalcontrol. Although this has been a feature of the banking and financial sectorsfor some time, these requirements have been further enhanced, while in thepublic sector rigorous provisions are now also in force.In developing the Chad-Cameroon PipelineProject, the  World Bank attempted to createa structure that would  result in  better government practices, more  responsive corporations, and benefits providedto the  affected communities.

The  $3.7  billionPipeline is the  largest privately financedproject in Africa, and has  been controversialfrom  the time of its initiation.The  Pipeline is being  built with the  World Bank’s help,103   but  it also  includes the governments of Chad and  Cameroon, as  well  as a consortium of transnational   corporations, with  the   bulk   of  shares  held   by Exxon, Chevron, and  Petronas  (the   Malaysian state  oil  company) The  World  Bankapproved a loan  for the project in  June 2000,  and construction of  the   Pipelinebegan in  October 2000, with the presidentsof both  Chad and Cameroon on  hand.

The project involves three  hundred  oil  wells   and   a   pipelinethat stretches 1,070  kilometers.The  first oil began flowing  from  thePipeline in July 2003.Controversy over  the  projecthas resulted from  a  number of factors. First, the  governments of Chad and Cameroon have various  human rights and corruption troubles.

For  example, members  of the  ChadianParliament who  opposed the  Pipeline were jailed.   Second,the  project has had a  significant environmental impact on forests and other natural habitats.  Indeed, the  route of the  Pipeline was  changed to protect some  indigenous communities   and environmentallysensitive areas  although problems remain.  


I'm Gerard!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out