You’ll then be well-prepared to craft your response to Part 83, competently. As you methodically work your way through each of the parts/sub-parts from Part A through Part BE, you are positioning yourself to be able to logically respond to Part B:3 Deficiency with Greatest Potential Impact, as it relates to Energy IT Infrastructure and its effectiveness in supporting company’s current and future business strategy and operations. Indeed, the reader should already know which deficiency (I weakness or threat) you will present in BE, after they have read your 82 discussion.There should be no surprises in your BE response. In BE you will explicitly discuss the implications of the deficiency that emerged atop your list from Part 82.
It is your opportunity and responsibility to not only discuss the direct implication of that deficiency on the IT Infrastructure itself, but also the implications of that deficiency on existing and future business operations and strategies (I. E. , the company’s growth/globalization strategy). Parts A through BE position you for 83. Likewise, Parts C through Del build from 83.Where Do You Start? Part A: SOOT Analysis is not itself graded, if you look at the rubric.
- Thesis Statement
- Structure and Outline
- Voice and Grammar
That said, most everything that you are asked to do in the remainder of the task is based off of your part A: SOOT Analysis results. There is no specific number of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, or threats that you are asked to identify. You should try to be comprehensive. Strongly suggest students refer to the “satisfactory” column of the associate rubric, part by part (Task #1 is graded on a 3 point rubric).Therein is the definition of a pass and the benchmark the evaluator will use to assess your submission.
Think of it as a contract between you (the writer) and the evaluator (the reader). Hold them to it by using the Task Instructions and Rubric in conjunction with one another. Trust me, they will do the same. While Part A (your SOOT Analysis) is not actually graded, it does represent necessary preparatory “Grunt Work” for completing the subsequent parts which are graded.
Suggest you use and adapt (to an IT Infrastructure context) the 4 sets Of questions within the “SOOT Analysis – Skillful Job Aid Series, immediately below, to help you generate appropriate strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, as they relate to the IT Infrastructure described in he associated case study for this task (Energy). Then use the 4 quadrant SOOT Analysis matrix (provided at the end of this article) to layout your actual SOOT Analysis results. The completed SOOT Analysis matrix will provide the foundation for the subsequent graded parts of Task , which begins with your part AY Evaluation of Strengths discussion.Keep in mind, strengths and opportunities are the positives of the IT Infrastructure, while weaknesses and threats are the negatives (I. E. , deficiencies) of the IT Infrastructure. THE SOOT ANALYSIS (Source: Understanding Positioning Skillful video coated in the MAT COOS) Instructions: use this Skilled to help you think about how to approach the required MAT Task #1 Part A: SOOT Analysis. Revise/Adapt the questions to make them particularly relevant to Energy Company’s IT Infrastructure and then answer them in the context of the case study in order to generate your SOOT results.
At this point, it is also useful to make notes which support your logic as to why you identified each strength, weakness, opportunity, and threat, in terms of the their relationship to what the company is trying to do from a business perspective. You will have to draw from these connections in later parts of the task, so you might as well document them now so you can easily refer to them. If you cannot make the explicit connection for each, you’ll probably want to reconsider whether to include them at all. SOOT Analysis – Skillfulness Aid series, 02003 Strengths INTERNAL Weaknesses Distinct competencies?Adequate financial resources? Good relations with customers? Good competitive skills? Expertise in needed areas? Recognized market leader? Well-planned operational strategies? Innovative projects / products / services? Good industry reputation? Access to economies Of scale? Somewhat insulated from Competition? Cost advantages? Competitive advantages? Proven management? Other? No clear strategic direction? Fading competitive position? Inferior profits because..
..? Lack of managerial talents? Missing key skills and competence? Poor implementation strategies? Internal operating problems? Vulnerability to competitive pressure?Narrow product/service lines? Competitive disadvantages? Inferior marketing skills? Inability to finance strategic changes? Opportunities EXTERNAL The retreats Additional customer groups available? Entry into new markets or segments? Expand line to meet broader range of client needs? Chance to diversify into related areas? Complacency among competitive firms? Fast market growth? Lack of dominant competitor? Other? Entry of new competition likely? Slow market growth? Chance of adverse government policies? Growing competition? Vulnerability to economic cycles? Growing bargaining power of clients? Changing customer trends?Adverse demographic changes? THE GRADING BEGINS part AY Strengths – Here, you are expected to evaluate the list Of strengths you generated during your initial SOOT Analysis.
Review your list of strengths and evaluate each one by drawing from the connection you made for each to the business strategy, earlier. First, evaluate each of your strengths independent of the other strengths. Then evaluate all of them in relation to the other strengths. An evaluation of this type should result in your logical procrastination of your strengths for the reader, from the most impact strength progressively through the less impact ones.
Part AY: Weaknesses – Here, you are expected to evaluate the list of weaknesses you generated during your initial SOOT Analysis. Review your list f weaknesses and evaluate each one by drawing from the con mention you made for each to the business strategy, earlier. First, evaluate each weakness independent of the other weaknesses.
Then evaluate all of them in relation to the other weaknesses. An evaluation of this type should result in your logical procrastination of your weaknesses for the reader, from the most impact weakness progressively through the less impact ones.KEEP in MIND: when you get to Part 82: Deficiencies, you are expected to combine your Part AY: Weaknesses and Part AY: Threats into one collective list of deficiencies (I. Eћ active things you identified related to the IT Infrastructure), and prioritize that combined list as you did for the two independent lists in Parts AY and AY. All of what you will have done up to that point will position you to be able to respond competently and logically to Part 83: The One Deficiency with Greatest Potential for Negative Impact.Part AY: Opportunities – Here, you are expected to analyze the list of opportunities you generated during your initial SOOT Analysis.
Review your list of opportunities and analyze each one by drawing from the connection you made for each to the business strategy, earlier. First, analyze each opportunity independent of the others. Then evaluate all of them in relation to the other opportunities. An evaluation of this type should result in your logical procrastination of your opportunities for the reader, from the potentially most impact opportunity progressively through the potentially less impact ones.Part ,AY: Threats – Here, you are expected to analyze the list of threats you generated during your initial SOOT Analysis. Review your list of threats and analyze each one by drawing from the connection you made for each to the business strategy, earlier. First, analyze each threat independent of the others.
Then evaluate all of them in relation to the other threats. An evaluation of this type should result in your logical procrastination of your threats for the reader, from the potentially most impact threat progressively through the potentially less impact ones.Part B, as with Part A earlier, is not itself graded, if you look at the rubric. While Part B (Analyze your SOOT Results) is not actually graded, it does represent an introductory statement for the necessary preparatory “Grunt Work’ for completing the subsequent sub-parts which are graded (Bal, Bal a, 2, and 83). Part B simply says, “Analyze the results obtained in the SOOT analysis by doing the following:” which begins with the next graded part, Bal .
Part Bal : Strengths – Here, you are expected to generate 2 distinctly different examples.Specifically, you are to choose from the list of “Strengths” you identified earlier, and identify two different ways Energy can leverage one or more of those strengths, in a manner that will improve an existing Company product or service. For example: Ex #1: Energy can leverage Strength W, in Manner X, so as to improve existing Product/Service Y, in the following Respect Z. Ex #2: Energy can leverage Strength A, in Manner B, so as to improve existing Product/Service C, in the following Respect D.
Might you choose to leverage two strengths collaboratively, to form one example?It’s possible, but it will be your responsibility to explain that scenario, so that the reader can clearly follow and assess the practicality of your idea (as is also the case if you choose to leverage 1 strength at a time for each of your two examples). In terms of viable existing products/services, keep in mind you have the latitude to choose from the existing products/services that Energy offers to external customers or existing products/services that Energy’s IT Jinni provides to other business units internal to Energy. The choice is yours in this regard, for both of your two distinctly different examples.In short and in general, your two examples ought to explain how the Company can use something they are already doing well (a strength), in a different manner than they are currently (leverage), to improve something they already provide (an existing product or service) Part Blab: Opportunities – Here, you are expected to generate 2 distinctly different examples. Specifically, you are to choose from the list of Opportunities” you identified earlier, and identify two different ways Energy could be using their existing IT Infrastructure (I. E.
No major investments in new IT), in a manner that will enable the Company to proved a “new” product or service. For example: Ex #1 Energy can further exploit Existing IT Infrastructure Capability W, in Manner X, to provide new Product/Service Y. Ex #2: Energy can further exploit Existing IT Infrastructure Capability A in Manner B, to provide new Product/Service C. In terms of viable target customers for the new products/services, keep in mind you have the latitude to target external customers or other business units internal to Energy.The choice is yours in this regard, for both of your two distinctly different examples. Part BE: Deficiencies – Here, you are expected to combine your two lists of negatives from your SOOT Analysis.
Specifically, you are to combine your list of AY: Weaknesses and your list of AY: Threat into a single list and evaluate the collective list of “deficiencies” in relation to one another. As with AY and AY earlier, an evaluation of this type should result in your logical procrastination f the IT Infrastructure’s Deficiencies (I. E.
Weaknesses and threats) for the reader, from the most negatively impact progressively through the less impact ones. By the time the reader is finished reading your 82 response, they should already know which deficiency will be the focus of your BE discussion. Part BE: Deficiency with Greatest Impact – Congratulations! You have reached the summit! Now, do due diligence to the view you’ve taken in during your ascent, as you convince the reader that the 1 deficiency you’ll discuss here is indeed “the greatest” of those your analysis uncovered.
Much of the fodder for this section will have already been developed in earlier parts of the task (AY or AY and 82), depending on whether the deficiency you identify is a weakness or threat. Here, is your opportunity and responsibility to tie up any loose ends and sell the reader on why this deficiency is the one that will produce the “most bang for Energy buck,” if addressed (versus 1 of the other deficiencies discussed in BE, given only 1 can be addressed at this time). You need to sell potential stakeholders on the results of your analysis to this point, so that they will inanimately buy into your Part D: Recommendation.Having performed a thorough SOOT Analysis, this is one key part of formally laying out the value proposition, which will be used by the COT when he assesses the recommended solution you will present in Part D. Part C, as with Parts A and 8 earlier, is not itself graded, if you look at the rubric. While Part C (Research Potential Solutions to BE Deficiency) is not actually graded, it does represent an introductory Statement for the necessary preparatory “Grunt Work” for completing the subsequent us b-parts which are graded (C 1, CLC a, CA, and Ca).Across the various sub-parts of C the expectation is that you research attention solutions that Energy could pursue to address the BE deficiency, discuss the actual research you performed and the results produced, as well as your ongoing strategy for remaining up to date over time regarding technological innovations related to that 83 deficiency.
Part C simply says, “Research potential solutions that could address the weakness or threat discussed in part BE” which begins with the next graded part, CLC .Keep in mind, the credibility of your Part D: Recommendation is in part a function of the quality of the research you do here (credibility of sources, reader of sources, consistency of key findings across those sources, etc. ), in addition to the viability of your recommendation itself in light of Energy needs and limitations. Part CLC : Research Strategies – Here, you are expected to explicitly document the research you performed. Identify and discuss the appropriateness of the specific sources consulted, not just general explanations.For example, if you used the internet, a trade journal, and relevant human experts, be sure to identify which internet site, which specific trade journal, and which human experts. Also, you’ll want to address such considerations as (1 ) evidence of he credibility of the so recess cons Tied, (2) support for the value of the information obtained, (3) evidence of the breadth of information captured across the chosen mix of sources, and (4) consistency of key findings captured across sources. Art Claw: Current Technology Examples – This is where you discuss the potential alternative technological solutions identified through your research activities.
Here, you are expected to present and discuss at least 2 technological solutions (with broadly proven practical reliability), that could realistically and effectively address the 83 deficiency. Tryingly suggest you present each, one at a time, being sure to discuss the Pros and Cons associated with each.How you present the potential alternatives here can provide sound logic for your Part D: Recommendation, as well as ammunition for your part Del: Justification! Part CA: Staying Informed – Here, you are expected to describe your ongoing Strategy for “remaining in the know’ with respect to the emergence of technological innovations over time, related to your 83 deficiency. You’ll want to consider and include in your discussion such things as the activities you’ll engage in (e. G.
Specific blobs, reading specific periodicals, attending specific conferences, visiting specific internet sites, etc. , directly relevant to the BE deficiency. You’ll also want to address the frequency in which you plan to consult these sources, as well as what you plan to do with the information gleaned from these sources (e. G. , organize, store, and access for future reference, etc. ).
Part Ca: Emerging Technology Examples – Here, you are expected to present and discuss at least 2 examples of an emerging tech oenology (related to “technological innovations” within the IT or Energy fields), that could elastically and effectively provide Energy a “competitive advantage” (I. . , I strongly suggest you present each example, one at a time, being sure to discuss the Pros and Cons associated with each. Emerging Technology versus Conventional Technology Distinction: An “emerging technology” (as distinguished from a conventional tech oenology) is a technology that broaches new territory in some significant way, with new technological developments. Emerging technologies are those technical innovations which represent progressive developments within a field for competitive advantage.Notably, the opinion on the degree of impact, status, and economic viability of several emerging technologies vary.
Below are emerging technology examples within the IT and Energy industries. Emerging Technologies with the IT Industry Emerging Technologies with the Energy Industry Radio Frequency Identification (REID), Artificial Intelligence (AY), Quantum Cryptography, Mobile Collaboration and E-Learning, GAL. Optical Discs, Quantum Computing, etc.
Airborne Wind Turbine, Artificial Photosynthesis, Concentrated Solar Power, Zero-Energy Building, etc.Competitive Advantage (Michael Porter identified 2 basic types): Cost advantage Differentiation advantage A competitive advantage exists when the firm is able to deliver the same benefits as competitors but at a lower cost (cost advantage), or deliver benefits that exceed those of competing products (differentiation advantage). Thus, a competitive advantage enables the firm to create superior value for its customers and superior profits for itself.Part D: Project Recommendation – IT Infrastructure Upgrade Proposal – Here is where you select one of the potential solutions identified through your research and discussed in Part CLC a.
Specifically, you are expected to develop n IT Infrastructure Upgrade Project Proposal, that will resolve the BE deficiency. The expectations are that you will address the key hardware, software, and staffing and systems support considerations related to your proposed solution, typical of any such IT project proposal.You should also make explicit, how your project will improve the existing IT infrastructure by directly address the identified 83 deficiency, and the specific business benefits Energy can expect to garner as a result of the implementation. Depending on how well you have satisfied the expectation in the earlier parts f the task, you should already have much of the thinking, and to some extent material, necessary to satisfy the expectations in this regard.Part Del : Justification – Here, you are expected to justify and support your Part D: IT Infrastructure Project proposal, based explicitly on your part C: Research. The credibility of your research (e.
G. , breadth of sources consulted, consistency of information gathered across sources, integrity of sources, and interpretation of the data collected), the viability and appropriateness of your solution recommendation versus that of other alternatives identified wrought your research, are examples of the considerations you should bring to bear in justifying your Part D proposal.