What are the implications of being a “loner” or of close fertilization on/off the job? Presented by: Christopher Bailey, Daniel Dins, Levi White, Jaded Alveolar, and Larry Knight According to The American Heritage Dictionary, ‘to fraternity is to associate with others In a brotherly or congenial way (“Fraternity ) ” It also states a loner is “one who avoids the company of others (“Loner”). ” In the workplace, there are many implications of being a loner, or of close fertilization on, and off, the job.
The perception of you from those in the workplace affects remissions, a firm’s communication culture, formation of cliques, and dating. An organization’s policies may also have rules governing workplace fertilization. We will focus on these areas. So how does being an office loner or fraternities with other employees apply to an organization’s policies? Due to experience and evidence of how fertilization affects the workplace, many organizations have an outlined policy. These policies promote, discourage, or regulate how employees may interact with each other on, and off, the job.
These policies can lead to a culture that loners thrive in or an environment where they are subject to prejudice. The guidelines set forth by companies are to prevent “worst case” scenarios from occurring and to try to limit potential litigation. Some of the most notable fertilization policies are implemented in the military; they outline how enlisted men and women are able to fraternity as well as the consequences of going against the policies in place. Generally, the concern is of fertilization between an officer and an enlisted member.
According to Assistant Inspector General, SF Cameron Held, such fertilization may diminish the “leadership climate of the unit and evildoing disciplined and cohesive units (Held). ” This same thought process also applies to the civilian workforce. If management and subordinates blur the lines of professional conduct then the firm and its profits may suffer. Equally, employees and those in the military may not want to find themselves in an awkward or compromising relationship and find themselves labeled as a loner for their choice to avoid potential conflict.
While an organizations policy does not set out any regulatory guidelines to deal with a loner, there is no need for disciplinary action in such cases. Well-rounded managers will apply homeless as an advocate to best work with, support, and guide a loner in the workplace. It is through a skilled manager that a loner can excel in some workplace environments. How those who fraternity, or choose to be loners, navigate the corporate environment may also have an effect upon promotions (Pogo). Communication culture has changed throughout the years. We face new challenges every day.
With the growing demand of working all over with different countries, we must communicate clearly with each other. At times that can be difficult considering the language barriers and different cultural styles. To communicate with one another we must learn and take into account every one’s cultures. Language barriers are the biggest hold back in the business world because most languages have double meanings to certain words or phrases (Penn). For example, in English, we have a ton of double meanings words like “eye and l” and if someone uses these wrong the whole message is wrong.
Alternatively, if someone does not know what he or she means, then the message will be wrong also. As communicators, we must make sure our message is clear and we want to make sure the person receiving the message understands it as well. Cultural styles are another part of the business world because of all the interaction that goes on in the different countries. People must learn about different cultures, so communicating is easier. People have to make sure that you respect other people’s customs when effectively communicating.
For example, a handshake in the United States is a gesture Americans use, but in another country, it could not be accepted and considered rude. Another gesture is looking someone in the eye when spoken to; we do this in the United States because it is respectful, but in other countries, it is considered rude. Humor can be taken as rude and offensive if the other person you are tall king to does not get it (Cross Communication). Communication culture has changed throughout the world with all the new technological advancements.
These advancements in technology have made it easier to get a hold of people all over the world, but we still have to be effective communicators. We still have to get our message across clearly and take in account for other’s cultural differences. Businesses want everyone to get along and things to run smoothly. Therefore, businesses try to make sure every message is given and received clearly. If you do not respect other’s languages, it can cause problems like people not wanting to work with you or formation of cliques in the work place. Every business will tell you that they do not want these problems.
Once these problems are present then the business has to fix them to ensure a positive work environment. Every. Veer you look you can find cliques, or groups of people who separate themselves from others deemed “unworthy,” this even includes the workplace. The workplace is the perfect environment to support cliques and their formation. There is a large amount of people who all have different levels and morals, so a select few are likely to share some of these beliefs/ morals and are, therefore, very likely to form into the dreaded workplace clique.
Some may say that cliques could be an asset for the unity of coworkers and will enhance the work that these employees can produce. Those who claim this are obviously uninformed of the damage it can do to the overall production and morale of an organization. Sure, if cliques involved everyone, then production would be booming, but the reality is that usually one or more employees get left out. Those left out of a clique can sibyl suffer because the members of a clique may keep valuable information away from the “loner” which could affect the productivity of the unit, as a whole.
Bullying can also be an issue if clique members become severely exclusive. Bullying is never a good thing, even when it involves adult employees. It can lower the self-esteem of those bullied and low self-esteem does not promote high levels of production (Gray). Bullying is not the only problem. In most cases, clique members are arrogant, self-centered, and just rude to outsiders, so this too can disrupt the unity and overall “team” aspect n the workplace (Walker). The best and most productive way to work is to work as a tight-knit, well-oiled machine, and cliques are the rust that keeps the machine from running smoothly.
Although it is difficult and rare, there is a possibility for a clique being a positive force in the workplace. For instance, a clique can help with the encouragement of one another if the clique is not extremely exclusive and if the clique members do not hold their group higher on their list of priorities than their production at work (Walker). The formation of cliques in the workplace is more than likely a bad thing for the reduction of a corporation. There is little chance of a plus side occurring, but there is a possibility.
However, the good definitely does not outweigh the bad when it comes to cliques and their effect on a corporation, so limiting the formations of these cliques is a good idea for corporation heads. Dating is another factor in the workforce that can influence cliques and their performance on the job. The workplace environment is conducive to the formation of relationships because for many people it is the largest social outlet in their lives. Many team building and company morale practices promote the colonization of employees that can lead to the formation of relationships.
Common interests are often shared among employees at the same workplace, drawn together by company values both hold important (Westphalia). Participation of employees, in good relationships, improves their individual productivity since both employees are happy. Fertilization on the job is largely thought of when dating is mentioned. In fact, many company policies regarding fertilization include a section dedicated just to dating in the workplace. There are both pros and cons to dating in the workplace that employers must take into account when forming employee policies.
Whether or not the benefits of having a relaxed dating policy outweigh the negative problems a company faces depends on the company values and its size. The problems companies face when employees date are often expensive for the company to add Reese. Favoritism, sexual harassment, morale, professional ethics, and discrimination all can lead to a lawsuit that stems from a relationship gone sour at work. Litigation is an expensive process that employers are responsible to minimize cost and protect both the company and employees. There are many methods available for a company to minimize future litigation through its policies and practices.
Some companies allow workplace romances but require both parties involved to sign a “Consensual Relationship Agreement. ” This alternative to a “No Dating” policy requires the employees to acknowledge the consensual nature of their relationship, informs them of the sexual harassment policies, reporting methods, and protections available to them, and both parties agree that the relationship is to not impact or interfere in the workplace. This policy allows employees control over their relationship choices and protects the employer in some cases of future litigation.
Morale is also impacted depending upon the age range of employees and whether or not there is a strict “no dating” policy. To be successful, careful planning and the written language of a company’s fertilization policy are crucial. The company must state in, “plain English,” what it defines as dating and what the consequences will be for violation of the policy. Enforcement of any policy is expensive and difficult for a company to enforce. If questionable practices are utilized to investigate an employee suspected of violating company policies the employee may file suit.
Additionally, employers face the burden of not infringing upon the privacy rights of employees (Regulating). For obvious reasons, fertilization is a big part of the corporate world. The communication culture and misunderstandings that can come along with working with someone of another culture, cliques and the possibility that bullying can be involved, and worst of all, the dating of two coworkers and a later breakup, can all be very devastating to a business’s production levels. In business, high production and maximum profit are the goals and sometimes retardation can keep a corporation from reaching these goals.
This is why most big businesses regulate how much fertilization goes on within their workforce. There is nothing wrong with either being very social or being a “loner,” but at the workplace, everyone should have professional attitudes, and regulations on workplace relationships are necessary for a business that wishes to thrive to do exactly that.