EFFECT OF SWITCHING COST ON REPURCHASE INTENTION WITH CUSTOMER SATISFACTION AS A MODERATING VARIABLE(Study on Smartphone Products)Gusti Ayu AghivirwiatiI Gusti Ayu Ketut GiantariNi Nyoman Kerti YasaUniversitas [email protected] days, consumers can obtain information of a product with ease. It is become the basis consideration to switch to other companies.
Companies should be able to anticipate this isue with a strategy that can retain old customers to re-buy their products. The purpose of this study is to explain effect of switching cost to repurchase intentions with customer satisfaction as a moderating variable. The subjects of this study are the users of smartphone products with a sample of 166 people by purpose sampling. Data is analyzed by using Moderated Regression Analysis.
The results shows that switching costs and customer satisfaction have a significant positive effect on repurchase intention and customer satisfaction have moderating effect on relation of switching cost and repurchase intention. This study imply that the smartphone industry should maintain and increase its switching cost as to innovate and build a superior feature than its competitors. The smallest value obtained by evaluation cost which means that consumers can more easily evaluate the existing smartphones in the market so that industry players have to do a promotion showing that their products are the best and have their own advantages.Keywords: Repurchase Intention, Switching Cost, Customer SatisfactionINTRODUCTIONThe development of technology and information today make consumers can obtain information of a product, then compare it with similar products with ease. Information obtained by consumers can be the basis of its consideration to switch to using products from other companies.
Companies should be able to anticipate this with a strategy that can keep existing customers. A strategy that companies can use to retain their customers is by locking in to consumers (Dollinger, 2008). This strategy is basically the use of switching costs to keep consumers loyal using their company’s products (Dollinger, 2008).
Dollinger (2008) also states that switching costs are costs that lock buyers into a continuing relationship with the seller. As the company succeeds in establishing the perception that consumers will face high switching costs, this will increase the Repurchase intention of their products. The results of research on the effect of switching costs on repurchase intention until the end of the year 2016 still vary. Research by Jones et al.
(2002) shows that all cost dimensions shift positively and significantly related to repurchase intention in the sample as a whole, the strongest association occurs with the lost performance cost. Danesh et al. (2012) indicates that switching barriers have a positive relationship to customer retention. According to Blut et al. (2015) increased switching costs can directly raise the intention and repurchase action. Wibowo (2013) study shows that switching costs, attractiveness of alternative, interpersonal relationships, and service recovery have a significant effect on repurchase intentions.
But there are different research results. Han et al. (2014) who find that switching costs have no effect on customer satisfaction and buy-back intentions. While the results of the Tuu (2015) show that the money factor, time, energy and social ties in the cost-switching dimension have a moderately negative effect, but the cost of a relational switch has a moderate positive effect on the relationship of buy-back intentions.Differences in previous research results can occur because there are other variables that may not have been included in the model so that research can be re-done by adding customer satisfaction as a moderating variable.
The use of customer satisfaction variables is based on the research of Jones et al. (2000), which suggests that the relationship between switching costs and repurchase intentions can be moderated by other variables, namely customer satisfaction. The findings of Ibzan et al. (2016) suggests that there is a positive relationship between customer satisfaction and buy-back intentions, satisfied consumers are more likely to continue their relationship with certain companies than dissatisfied ones.This study re-examine the effect of switching costs on repurchase intention with customer satisfaction as a moderator.
Research this time will be done on the smartphone industry. The current technological developments make smartphone manufacturers should continue to issue the latest products and make the life of one type and smartphone features relatively short. Being the current market leader is not a guarantee the company will continue to be the best and have the highest sales in its industry. As a result smartphone companies are required to be able to retain consumers and increase the intention to buy back consumers. This is necessary so that when consumers want to change the smartphone to the latest features, he still chose to use the smartphone with the same brand.
THEORIES AND MODELS UNDERPINNING THE STUDYRepurchase IntentionIntention is an attitude statement about how a person will behave in the future (Soderlund and Ohman, 2003). The repurchase intention is a consumer commitment that formed after the consumer made a purchase of a product or service. Cronin et al. (2000) considers repurchase intention and behavorial intention as idendik construction.
Repurchase intentions can be classified into a more general concept of behavorial intention that includes intentions related to repurchase, such as the intention to buy the product back. Word-of-, mouth intention and complaint intention (Hossain, 2006). Customer buy or retention is the most important goal for a company’s success and perhaps the most important concept in marketing. The cost of generating new customers is believed to be about six times the cost of maintaining existing customers, consequently the company is concentrating on maintaining existing customers or getting them to buy back, rather than focusing entirely on getting new customers (Kitchathorn, 2009).
Switching CostMorgan and Hunt (1994) define switching costs as relationship cost costs in the viewpoint of expectation of all losses due to stopping relations or switching to other alternatives (Harsono, 2005). Moving costs include the struggle for change, time, and effort required to acquire the brand of a particular product (Julander and Soderlund, 2003).These costs can rarely be seen explicitly, but they can stand out and prove when consumers are faced with a reason to consider moving. Research by Burnham et al. (2003) shows that in switching cost there are three potential variables in it, namely procedural Switching Cost, Financial switching cost and Relational switching cost.Customer Satisfactionsatisfaction is a feeling of pleasure or disappointment of someone after comparing between perception and / or impression to the performance (or outcome) of a product and hope (Kotler, 2007).
Tse and Wilton in Tjiptono (2007) suggest that customer satisfaction or dissatisfaction is a customer response to a perceived disconfirmation between the previous expectations (or other performance norms) and the actual performance of the perceived product after its use. Wilkie (1990) expresses customer satisfaction as an emotional response to an evaluation of the consumption experience or product or service.Customer satisfaction will be achieved if expectations match the expectations received. Fornell et al. (1996) stated that customer satisfaction is high if the perceived value exceeds customer expectations.
To improve customer satisfaction, an organization must manage its resources. If the results received by the customer of an organization in accordance with his wishes, then the satisfaction can occur.center589915Repurchase Intention (Y)Customer Satisfaction (M)Switching Cost (X)00Repurchase Intention (Y)Customer Satisfaction (M)Switching Cost (X)The concept of the study is illustrated in Figure 1 below which shows the relationship of switching cost, repurchase intention and customer satisfaction.Figure 1.
Research Concept RESEARCH METHODOLOGYThe research will be conducted by survey method using a modified questionnaire instrument from Ting research in 2014 in Taiwan. The tests were conducted to analyze the effect of switching costs on repurchase intentions in the behavior of smartphone consumers in Indonesia. Furthermore, testing is also done by adding customer satisfaction as a moderating variable that is alleged to reinforce switching cost to repurchase intentions. The statistical tool used is moderate regression analysis (MRA).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONRespondent demographicOf the 170 questionnaires scattered, which can be used in the analysis of this study were 166. Data of respondents showed that of 166 respondents it was found that there were 85 men and 81 women. Characteristics of respondents in terms of age can be grouped into 3 (three) namely the first largest in the age range 17-26 years, amounting to 112, ages 27-36 years as many as 33 people, at vulnerable ages 36-47 years a number of 8 people and 13 people in the range age> 47 years. high school respondents amounted to 96 people, Bachelor as many as 58 people, and graduate 12 people.
Based on smartphone brand, Samsung is used by 52 people, Iphone is 61 people, Xiaomi is29 people and 24 people is Oppo. Hypotheses TestingThe result of moderate regression analysis is summarized in table 1 below.Tabel 1 Summary of MRAModel Regression Coeficient t-test Sig.
tX 0,478 7,926 0,000M 0,388 6,312 0,000XM 0,156 3,088 0,002The first hypothesis states that switching costs have a significant positive effect on repurchase intention. Submission of hypothesis refers to the value of the regression coefficient and significance value presented in Table 1. the value of switching cost regression coefficient is positive value of 0.478 and the significance value of 0.00 or less than 0.05 so it can be concluded that the first hypothesis accepted.
In other words, switching costs have a significant positive effect on repurchase intention.The second hypothesis states that customer satisfaction has a significant positive effect on repurchase intention. Submission of hypothesis also refers to the value of regression coefficient and significance value presented in Table 1. value of customer satisfaction regression coefficient is positive value of 0.
388 and significance value of 0.00 or less than 0.05 so it can be concluded that the second hypothesis accepted. In other words, customer satisfaction has a significant positive effect on buying intention.The third hypothesis states that customer satisfaction can moderate the effect of switching costs on repurchase intention.
Submission of hypothesis also refers to the value of regression coefficient and significance value presented in Table 1. value of regression coefficient of switching cost interaction and customer satisfaction is positive value of 0.156 and significance value of 0.
002 or smaller than 0.05, in addition the value of regression coefficient of interaction between the cost of switch and customer satisfaction is worth ? 0 so it can be concluded that the second hypothesis is accepted. In other words customer satisfaction can moderate the effect of switching costs against repurchase intention. It can further be concluded that customer satisfaction reinforces the significant positive influence of switching costs on customer satisfaction.DISCUSSIONAll switch cost indicators have a very high average value with the smallest average value of 4.
0122 on the indicator of cost evaluation. These three statements have the smallest average value of other indicator statements of 3.92. although the value is still high, but this figure shows that for the respondent, the evaluation cost has the smallest value of all switching cost indicators. This happens because of the easy access of current information about various smartphone products in the market so that evaluation of other smartphone product products is not too difficult.The results of this study are in accordance with the results of the study of Burnham et al.
(2003) which states that switching costs are an important factor to withstand consumer switching behaviors, which means that increased switching costs increase repurchase intentions. The results of this study also in accordance with research Danesh et al. (2012) indicating that switching barrier switching costs have a positive relationship to customer retention that will lead to an increase in repurchase intentions. The results of this study are also consistent with research Wibowo (2013) who found that switching costs have a significant positive effect on repurchase intention as well as research Blut et al.
(2015) proving that increased switching costs can directly raise the buying intention and behavior. In addition to this study, the results of this study also support the theory proposed by Bendapudi and Berry (1997) which states that switching costs can form a lock-in effect on consumers. This lock-in effect will encourage consumers to continue purchasing products from the same company, in other words will increase repurchase intention.
Variable customer satisfaction has an average value of 4.25 so it can be concluded most respondents feel satisfied will smartphone products used today. Of the four statements used, the lowest value of 4.20 is owned by the M4 indicator which is a reverse item of the M1 statement.The results of this study are consistent with the research Hadioetomo (2010) shows satisfied customers will have the desire to buy back.
The positive effect of customer satisfaction on repurchase intentions is also shown by Sumitro’s (2016) study which found that customer satisfaction has a positive and significant effect on repurchase intentions. Similar results were also reinforced by Rizki’s (2015) findings of customer satisfaction having a significant positive effect on repurchase intention.This study also corresponds to Danesh et al.
(2012) states that customer satisfaction has an effect on the positive relationship of customer retention and research Ibzan et al. (2016) who found that there was a positive effect of customer satisfaction on repurchase intentions, satisfied consumers were more likely to continue their relationship with certain companies than dissatisfied ones. This research also supports Tjiptono’s (2007) assertion that customer satisfaction will provide some other benefits of the relationship between the company and the customer to be harmonious, provide a good basis for repeat purchase, can encourage the creation of customer loyalty, form a recommendation from mouth to the mouth is profitable for the company, the reputation of the company to be good in the eyes of customers, and the profit earned becomes increased.The standardized beta coefficients value of switching cost interaction and customer satisfaction is 0.165 or ? 0 so that customer satisfaction is proven to positively moderate the ability to influence switching cost to repurchase intentions. This means that when customer satisfaction is high, the positive effect of switching cost to repurchase intention will be further strengthened.
This result is in line with Jones et al’s (2002) suggestion that the effect of switching costs on repurchase intentions can be moderated with customer satisfaction. In addition, the results of this study also in accordance with the results of research Ting (2014) which indicates that when switching cost high then the intention to buy back will also be high and the effect of switching costs postifi to repurchase intention will be further strengthened by high customer satisfaction.CONCLUSIONThis study proves that switching costs have a significant positive effect on repurchase intention. besides it is proved also that customer satisfaction reinforces the significant positive influence of switching costs on repurchase intention.
It is recommended to actors in the smartphone industry to continue to maintain and increase switching cost to its products. As far as possible the smartphone industry players must innovate and build a superior feature than its competitors and inform the consumer.ReferencesBendapudi, N, & Leonard L. B. (1997).
Customer’s Motivation for Maintaining Relationship with Service Providers. Journal of Retailing, 73, 15-37.Blut, M., Frennea, C.
M., Mittal, V., ; Mothersbaugh, D. L. (2015). How Procedural, Financial and Relational Switching Cost Affect Customer Satisfaction, Repurchase Intention, and Repurchase Behavior: A Meta-Analysis.
International Journal of Research In Marketing. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2553402Burnham, T.A., Frels, J.
K. ; Mahajan, V. (2003). Consumer Switching Costs: A Typology, Antecedents, and Consequence.
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,31, 109-126.Cronin, J. Jr ; Taylor, S. (1992). Measuring Service Quality : Reexaniation and Extension, Journal of Marketing.
Cronin, J., Joseph, M. K., Brady, G. ; Thomas M.
H. (2000). Assessing the Effects of Quality, Value, and Customer Satisfaction on Consumer Behavioral Intentions in Service Environments. Journal of Retailing, 76(20), 193-218.Danesh, S.
, N. Nasab, S. A., ; Kwek, C, Ling. (2012). Study of Customer Satisfaction, Customer Trust and Switching Barriers on Customer Retention in Malaysia Hypermarkets.
International Journal of Business and Management, 7(7), 141-150.Dollinger, M. J. (2008) Entrepreneurship-Strategies and Resources. Fourth Edition.
Illinois: Marsh Publications.Dzhain, N. (2014). Impact of Switching Costs and Network Effects on Adoption of Mobile Platforms (Master Thesis). Helsinki: Aalto University School of Business.Fornell, C.
(1992). A National Customer Satisfaction Barometer: The Swedish Experience. Journal of Marketing, 56(1), 6-21.Fornell, J.
D. Michael, A. W., Eugene, C J.
; Bryant E. B.. (1996).
The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature, Purpose and Findings. Journal of Marketing. 60, 7-18.Hadioetomo.
(2010). Analisis Pengaruh Kualitas, Nilai, dan Kepuasan Pelanggan terhadap Niat Konsumen Membeli Kembali. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 6(2), 1-9.Han, J., Ko, D.W.
, ; Urmie, J. M. (2014).
The Role Of Satisfaction and Switching Costs in Medicare Part D Choices. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 10 (2), 398-407.Hossain, P. (2006).
A Relational Study on Perceived Value, Brand Preference, Customer Satisfaction, and Repurchase Intention in Context of AKIJ Textile Mills td in Bangladesh. Bangladesh: Independent University.Ibzan, E.
, Balarabe, F. ; Bayero, J. (2016). Consumer Satisfaction and Repurchase Intentions. Journal of Developing Country Studies, 6(2), 96-100.Jones, M.A., Mothersbaugh, D.L. ; Beatty, S.E. (2000). Switching Barriers and Repurchase Intentions in Services. Journal of Retailing, 76, 259-274.Jones, M.A., Mothersbaugh, D.L. and Beatty, S.E. (2002). Why Customers Stay: Measuring the Underlying Dimensions of Services Switching Costs and Managing Their Differential Strategic Outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 55, 441-450.Julander, C. ; Soderlund M. (2003). Effects of Switching Barriers on Satisfaction, Repurchase Intentions and Attitudinal Loyalty. SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Business Administration.No.2003:1.Kotler, P. (2007). Manajemen Pemasaran. Jakarta : PT. IndeksKitchathorn, P. (2009). Factor Influencing Customer Repurchase Intention : An Investigation of Switching Barriers that Influence the Relationship between Satisfaction and Repurchase Intention in the Low Cost airlines Industri in Thailand. School of Business Administration (DBA), University of South Australia, Australia.Morgan, R.M ; Hunt, S.D. (1994). The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58, 20-38.Morgan, N. A. ; Lopo, L. R. (2006). The Value of Different Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty Metrics in Predicting Business Performance,Marketing Science. 25(5), 426-439.Rizki, D. T. 2015. Pengaruh Kepuasan Pelanggan dan Switching Cost Terhadap Niat Beli Ulang Pengguna Layanan Operator Telekomunikasis Seluler Di Jakarta. Journal Bakrie, 3(2)Söderlund, M. ; Öhman, N. (2003). Behavioral Intentions in Satisfaction Research Revisited”, Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 12, 53-66.Sumitro. (2016). Analisis Kualitas Produk, Harga, Kepuasan Konsumen pada Niat Membeli Ulang: Studi Kasus pada Industri Kecil di Labuhanbatu. Jurnal Kewirausahaan dan Usaha Kecil Menengah, 1 (1), 37-40Ting, S. (2014). The Relationship between Customers’ Switching Cost and Repurchase Intention: The Moderating Role of Satisfaction. Journal of Service Science and Management, 7, 313-322.Tjiptono, F. (2007) . Pemasaran Jasa. Bayumedia. Malang-Jatim.Tuu, H H. (2015). The Moderator effects of switching cost and customer expertise in the satisfaction-repurchase intention relationship for mobile telecommunication service. Journal of economic and development, 17(2), 88-103.Wibowo, A. (2013). Analisis Pengaruh Switching Cost, Attractiveness Of Alternative, Interpersonal Relationship, Dan Service Recovery Terhadap Repurchase Intention Gsm Xl Prabayar. Jakarta: Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah.Wibowo, S. E., Ruswanti, E., & Januarko, U. (2013). Pengaruh Persepsi Kualitas Pelayanan terhadap Niat Pembelian Ulang pada Toko Buku Gramedia Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ekonomi, 4 (1), 56-64.Wilkie. W.L. (1990). Consumer Behaviour 2nd edI. New York: John Wiley & Sons