Amended After Examiner Comments essay

The module assessment consists of a 3000 word essay which analyses a case organization using one, or a maximum Of two Of the topics covered in the module, chosen by the student.

Choose an organization with which you are familiar to answer the following question: How can organization theory be used to analyses selected practices of (your chosen) organization? You should critically analyses authoritative sources, models and/or frameworks which you consider appropriate to chosen topic(s) and the organization. Assessment CriteriaApproaches to understanding and researching the nature of organizations are considered. Choices amongst these approaches are made. A research paradigm is therefore chosen, explained and consistently applied throughout the piece of work. One or a maximum of two module topics are chosen for the student to apply to an organizational setting. Two topics are chosen the assignment should explain how these topics are synthesized. The methods of data collection which would be appropriate to the chosen paradigm are explained and justified.There is an explanation of the ‘fit’ (or the absence of such a fit is discussed) between methods of data gathering, the analysis, the interpretation and the role of the writer of the assignment.

Sometimes it is hard to do all the work on your own
Let us help you get a good grade on your paper. Get expert help in mere 10 minutes with:
  • Thesis Statement
  • Structure and Outline
  • Voice and Grammar
  • Conclusion
Get essay help
No paying upfront

The data is critically analyses using relevant theories, models and frameworks from the chosen topic’s. The assignment should be clearly expressed, legible with accurate spelling and grammar, its structure appropriate, assertions supported and all material correctly referenced using the PAP guidelines. Credit will be given for originality, creativity, fluency of argument, use of examples and illustrations.Word limits and penalties for assignments Fifth assignment is within +10% of the stated word limit no penalty will apply. The word count is to be declared on the front page of your assignment and the assignment cover sheet. The word count does not include: Title and Contents page Reference list Appendices Appropriate tables, figures and illustrations Glossary Bibliography Quotes from interviews and focus groups.

Please note, in text citations [e. G. (Smith, 201 1)] and direct secondary quotations [e. G. “dib-dab nonsense analysis” (Smith, 2011 p. 23)] are INCLUDED in the word count.

If this word count is falsified, students are reminded that under RNA page D Section 3. 4 this will be regarded as academic misconduct. If the word limit of the full assignment exceeds the +10% limit, of the mark provisionally awarded to the assignment will be deducted. For example: if the assignment is worth 70 marks but is above the word limit by more than 10%, a penalty of 7 marks will be imposed, giving a final mark of 63. Students are advised that they may be asked to submit an electronic version Of their assignment.

Time limits and penalties for presentations The time allocated for the presentation must be adhered to. At the end of this time, the presentation will be stopped and will be marked based on what has been delivered within the time limit. Submission of Assessment: All assignments must be submitted via the Postgraduate Programmer Office. Each assignment must be accompanied by an Assessed Work Form which must be completed in full. The assignment will not be accepted by the Postgraduate Programmer Office unless the form is completed correctly. Marked assignments will be returned to students.It is advisable to retain a pop of your assignment for you own records. Your mark will be returned on the Assessed Work Form via the Postgraduate Programmer Office.

Mapping to programmer Goals and Objectives: This assessment will contribute directly to the following Postgraduate programmer goals and objectives. (Insert an ‘X’ in boxes where applicable, referring to appropriate programmer specification for mapping details) Goal One: Be independent, reflective critical thinkers Demonstrate awareness of their personal strengths and weaknesses through critical reflective practice. . Understand and challenge personal patterns of thinking and behaving. Goal Two: Be culturally and ethically aware Demonstrate their ability to work in diverse groups and teams.

X Reflect on their own ethical values. Goal Three: Have developed leadership and management capability Demonstrate their personal contribution to team effectiveness. Communicate complex issues effectively. 3.

Demonstrate decision making and problem solving skills. 4. Carry out presentations and lead discussions.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


I'm Gerard!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out